Mission Viejo Spousal Support Lawyer

Mission Viejo Spousal Support Lawyer

Mission Viejo Spousal Support Attorney

Since its establishment in 1977, Minyard Morris has dedicated over four decades to family law, focusing on numerous spousal support cases. Our firm brings together 20 attorneys, each specializing solely in family law within Orange County. Our combined expertise spans nearly three hundred years, allowing us to handle intricate family law cases effectively while providing personalized attention to our Mission Viejo clients.

The intricacies of spousal support law demand a comprehensive understanding of the governing statutes and judicial precedents, with judges wielding significant discretion in their decisions. It is vital to achieve an accurate decision early in the process, as modifications at the appellate level are infrequent. Spousal support agreements and orders often detail payment amounts, duration of support, potential reductions, and income assessments.

Spousal Support agreements may also include clauses that make spousal support non-modifiable, as specified in a final judgment. Establishing the marital standard of living may be a contentious process due to its variability and judicial interpretation of the issues, and our firm excels in navigating these complexities for our Mission Viejo clients.

Trusted Mission Viejo Spousal Support Lawyer

The Role of Marriage Length in Spousal Support

Subtle nuances in the law emerge when examining spousal support following marriages of different durations. Although variations between marriages lasting 9, 10, 11, or 15 years exist, the differences may be less significant than presumed depending on the facts.

The length of the marriage directly influences spousal support duration, with shorter marriages sometimes receiving similar considerations to those slightly longer. Many facts impact the duration of spousal support.

Spousal support orders are generally modifiable unless there is a mutual agreement stating otherwise. Courts can alter or modify spousal support orders following substantial life changes such as variations in income, health status, or other significant life or economic events.

Proficiency in Spousal Support Legislation

Our team’s thorough grasp of the detailed and complex spousal support laws ensures that we can guide our Mission Viejo clients through challenging legal landscapes. Achieving the correct ruling at the initial trial is crucial since appellate courts seldom reverse these decisions. Our adept handling of these legal matters ensures fair and just outcomes for our clients in Mission Viejo.

Understanding Spousal Support Order Components

The area of spousal support is defined by its detailed and nuanced nature. Laws and precedents provide a framework within which judges have extensive discretionary power. Accurate results from the outset are critical due to the infrequency of modifications on appeal.

The considerations within spousal support orders can be extensive, involving assessments of the marital living standard and income imputation of income for those who are unemployed or underemployed. These determinations often lead to significant legal disputes as the marital standard of living is not predetermined but instead subject to judicial interpretation.

Divorce and Inheritance in Relation to Spousal Support

Inheritances are treated as separate property belonging solely to the inheriting spouse, with no entitlement to the other spouse regardless of the marriage’s duration, children, or the nature of the relationship with the deceased. While this area of law is clear-cut, income generated from an inheritance can be considered in matters of spousal support, child support, or attorney fees. For example, if a spouse requires support but the other lacks sufficient income, funds from an inheritance might be considered as a financial resource.

The court also considers any income from inheritances when determining guideline child support amounts or in deciding on the allocation of legal fees. Future inheritances are typically not factored into spousal support decisions until they are realized.

Contact Our Skilled Mission Viejo Spousal Support Attorneys

Choosing the right spousal support attorney for your divorce in Mission Viejo is crucial if the outcome matters to you. With over 600 lawyers practicing in Orange County, the selection of the “right” spousal support lawyer may appear daunting. However, informed research and careful consideration can lead you to the most suitable attorney for your situation. The decision is not difficult if you carefully compare lawyers and law firms.

Trust in the experience and dedication of the family law firm that Mission Viejo residents have relied on for decades – Minyard Morris . Call us today at 949-724-1111 or send us an email to schedule your initial consultation.

Mission Viejo Family Law Practice Areas:

Mission Viejo Spousal Support Lawyer FAQ

If there is a demonstrated need by one spouse, and a demonstrated ability to pay relative to the other spouse, a divorce court will likely make an order for spousal support payable to the spouse in need. The determination of the amount, duration, and other terms of the spousal support order can be very complex.

Spousal Support

Free rent and meal allowances may be income. Deferred salary is income, as are recurring payments from family members (gifts) that are not loans or early inheritance. Unallocated, lump-sum, personal injury recovery, or annuity, payments are generally not characterized as income. Student loans and unrealized gain in shares of stock are not income. The proceeds received from the sale of stock that were reinvested are not income available for support.

A family law court may order one party to pay spousal support to the other, if that party has the need and the payor has the ability to pay. Spousal support payable before the judgment is entered is called temporary support, and spousal support paid after the judgment is called permanent spousal support.

Spousal support paid prior to the entry of the Judgment is characterized as temporary spousal support or pendent lite spousal support. Temporary spousal support may be ordered at a Request For Order (RFO) and is designed to maintain the status quo of the parties, where possible. The amount of temporary spousal support is often determined with the utilization of a formula accessed through the use of a computer software program (DissoMaster or X-Spouse).

Temporary spousal support may be ordered retroactively to the filing date of the Request for Order (RFO) seeking spousal support. Generally, the payor-spouse is credited with payments made to the payee-spouse or paid for that spouse’s benefit. However, a spousal support order at the trial may not be made retroactive to the date of the Petition unless a spouse had previously requested temporary spousal support (Mendoza v. Cuellar). A family law court may order temporary spousal support pending the determination of issues involved in an Out-of-State divorce (Gromeeko v. Gromeeko).

Temporary Spousal Support

Tax Issues

At the divorce trial, permanent spousal support may be ordered. The term “permanent” is misleading because permanent spousal support may be ordered for a limited period of time. The term permanent is intended to distinguish this spousal support from temporary spousal support. This spousal support is also referred to as post-judgment or long-term spousal support.

Potential Sequence of Steps and Procedural Events in a Divorce

Spousal Support Retroactivity

A court is to look to all circumstances when determining whether to extend spousal support (IRMO Wilson).There are many circumstances that may justify a modification of a permanent spousal support including the following:

  1. Decrease in income of the payor-spouse;
  2. Increase in income of the payee-spouse;
  3. End of child support;
  4. Discharge by payee-spouse of all community debts assigned to payee (IRMO Clements);
  5. Unrealized expectations that payee-spouse would be self-supporting (IRMO Beaust);
  6. Payee’s support of adult children (IRMO Serna);
  7. Cohabitation and romantic relationship;
  8. Increase in child support (IRMO McCann);
  9. Payor-spouse’s 65th birthday and retirement (IRMO Reynolds).

The following may not constitute a change of circumstances:

  • Payee-spouse paying expenses of daughter and two grandchildren (IRMO Serna);
  • Ability to access retirement funds without penalty (IRMO Dietz);
  • Generally, mere passage of time;
  • Increased income by payor-spouse without a showing by the payee-spouse that the original award failed to meet the marital standard of living;
  • Payee-spouse’s pursuit of an advanced degree as opposed to obtaining a job; and
  • Payee-spouse’s continued disability in a short-term marriage.

The award of permanent spousal support is based on the factors set forth in Family Code § 4320 as opposed to being based on the “status quo” as is the standard for temporary support matters. The divorce court cannot set permanent spousal support exclusively using the computer software formula used in setting temporary spousal support. Family Code § 4320 sets forth specific factors that the divorce court must consider:

a. The extent to which the earning capacity of each party is sufficient to maintain the standard of living established during the marriage, taking into account all of the following:

1. The marketable skills of the supported party; the job market for those skills; the time and expenses required for the supported party to acquire those skills; and the possible need for retraining or education to acquire other, more marketable skills or employment.

2. The extent to which the supported party’s present or future earning capacity is impaired by periods of unemployment that were incurred during the marriage to permit the supported party to devote time to domestic duties.

Permanent Support

b. The extent to which the supported party contributed to the attainment of an education, training, a career position, or a license by the supporting party.

c. The ability of the supporting party to pay spousal support, taking into account the supporting party’s earning capacity, earned and unearned income, assets, and standard of living.

d. The needs of each party based on the standard of living established during the marriage.

e. The obligations and assets, including the separate property, of each party.

f. The duration of the marriage.

g. The ability of the supported party to engage in gainful employment without unduly interfering with the interests of dependent children in the custody of the party.

h. The age and health of the parties.

i. Documented evidence, including a plea of nolo contendere, of any history of domestic violence, as defined in Section 6211, between the parties or perpetrated by either party against either party’s child, including, but not limited to, consideration of emotional distress resulting from domestic violence perpetrated against the supported party by the supporting party, and consideration of any history of violence against the supporting party by the supported party.

j. The immediate and specific tax consequences to each party.

k. The balance of the hardships to each party.

l. The goal that the supported party shall be self-supporting within a reasonable period of time. Except in the case of a marriage of long duration as described in Section 4336, a “reasonable period of time” for purposes of this section generally shall be one-half the length of the marriage. However, nothing in this section is intended to limit the court’s discretion to order support for a greater or lesser length of time, based on any of the other factors listed in this section, Section 4336, and the circumstances of the parties.

m. The criminal conviction of an abusive spouse shall be considered in making a reduction or elimination of a spousal support award in accordance with Section 4324.5 or 4325.

n. Any other factors the court determines are just and equitable.

F.C. § 4320 Factors

The marital standard of living is relevant to the determination of spousal support. However, it is just one of the Family Code Section 4320 factors (IRMO Smith / IRMO Zywiciel). It is neither a ceiling nor a floor for the amount of spousal support. The marital standard of living may be looked at by the divorce court as a benchmark. The divorce court may define the marital standard of living specifically with a dollar level or generally in terms like “middle class standard of living” (IRMO Kerr).

The divorce court must consider the marital standard of living of both parties, not just that of the payee spouse (IRMO Andreen).

Testimonials

HEAR FROM MINYARD MORRIS CLIENTS

Contact Us

SCHEDULE A MINYARD MORRIS CONSULTATION

Contact Minyard Morris now to schedule a consultation with our attorneys and legal professionals.